|
Does the code of the Quran
confirm the 24434 format?
.
It is the opinion of some believers that the code of the Quran (19) confirms
that the 24434 format of the Salat has been preserved across the
ages. This paper aims in Sha Allah to verify this claim.
With the use of the 24434 format and various other variables, these believers
proceeded to form linear arrangments
(numbers placed side by side), all of which produced multiples of nineteen.
Consequently, it was declared that these findings are awesome signs which
indicate the 24434 to be the correct format for prayer.
It is the aim here to verify mathematically the truth and validity of such
findings, and whether these signs truly present divine signs for such a claim
or not.
This paper also poses the question
of (What is the possibility of obtaining similar results by using a
different format than 24434?)
______________________
1- To conduct this comparative research let
us assume that the 5 daily Salat is
the correct number of
Salat
authorised in
the Quran
(for more
info about
this issue
please go to
the section
of Number
of Daily
Salat ).
2- Let us
also assume
that the total
number of
daily Raka's
of 17 to be
the
authorised
and
preserved
number for
daily Raka's.
3- For
demonstration
purposes, let
us replace
the
traditional
format
(24434),
with the
format
43244.
Now, what
is our
chance of
obtaining the
same
multiples of
19 by using
this new
format?
Well, take a
look at the
following:
Fact 1 The
total of the 5
digits in
43244 = 17
(same as
24434).
Fact 2
The number
43244 is
also a
multiple of
19
43244 =
19 x 2276
the sum
of the 4
digits 2276
is also 17
(2 + 2 +
7 + 6 = 17).
Fact 3
Now we
place the
number of
Raka's in the
day (17)
alongside
the number
of the Sura
that we read
in the prayer
(1) alongside
our new
format
43244
We obtain
the number
17143244
This is also
a multiple of
19
Fact 4
Here we can
start to use
more
variables
that are all
related to the
prayer, and
thus make
the result
appear more
impressive.
Let us write
the number
of prayers
(5) followed
by the total
number of
raka's (17)
followed by
the number
of the Sura
(Key) that
we read in
the prayer
(1), followed
by the
number of
verses in the
Key (7) then
the
Gematrical
value of the
Key (786)
.
This will
give us
51717786
Alongside
these digits
we write the
number
1423324454.
This number
is simply the
number of
each prayer
followed by
its number
of raka's
(remember
we are
assuming the
format to be
43244!).
Thus the
first prayer
(1) will be
followed by
the number
of raka's (4)
and the
second (2)
followed by
(3) and so
on till we
have
1423324454.
The resulting
long number
will be :
51717786
1423324454
which is also
a multiple of
19.
Fact 5
Many
variations
can be
constructed
to obtain
further
multiples
.. for
example the
number of
the prayers
(5) could be
added to the
total number
of raka'a
(17)
.
This gives
22
.. If we
place that
number after
the number
we used in
the last
example
(1423324454) , we get :
1423324454
22
.. = 19
x 19 x
.
Fact 6 The
sceptics will
soon say,
'but these
manipulations do not
contain the
four factors
of the Prayer
which are
the (number
of keys,
bowing,
prostration
and
tashahud in
every
prayer)!
Ok! Let us
incorporate
these
factors.
Here we
include these
4 factors,
and also the
very
important
number of
prayers in a
day (5).
By similar
arrangement
we get the
number :
114482
23362 32241
44482 54482
5
This number
is also a
multiple of
19
It is made
up of the
number of
the Key (1)
then the
number of
the first
prayer (1)
then the
number
Keys (4),
Bowing (4),
prostration
(8) and
tashahud (2)
. And the
same for the
2nd, 3rd,
4th, and 5th
prayers
followed by
the total
number of
prayers (5).
(remember
we are still
using the
format of
43244).
Now! Are
we justified
in calling
these
multiples
awesome
signs that
confirm that
the Raka's in
our 5 daily
prayers is in
the 43244
format ?
If you are
not
convinced
yet, take a
look at the
following :
Fact 7
The same
results will
stand for all
variations
that used the
number 17
but did not
use the
individual
raka for
each prayer
(24434) .....
these are :
| Sat |
Sun |
Mon |
Tues |
Wed |
Thur |
Frid |
|
| 17 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
17 |
15 |
= 19 x .... |
Friday is
written as 15
Raka due to
the
traditional
deduction of
2 raka from
the noon
prayer
(replaced by
the sermon).
The same is
applicable to
the result
obtained by
inserting the
number of
the day
before the
units of
prayer in
each day.
The resultant
number is
also a
multiple of
19:
| Sat |
Sun |
Mon |
Tues |
Wed |
Thur |
Frid |
|
| 117 |
217 |
317 |
417 |
517 |
617 |
715 |
= 19 x .... |
The same as
the previous,
except take
Friday as the
first day of
the week,
instead of
the last day.
The resultant
number is
also a
multiple of
19:
| Sat |
Sun |
Mon |
Tues |
Wed |
Thur |
Frid |
|
| 115 |
217 |
317 |
417 |
517 |
617 |
717 |
= 19 x .... |
Fact 8
Now
replace
every 17 by
our new
assumed
format
which is
43244
(remember
we are still
using the
format
43244 as our
assumption).
Similary,
and since
the friday
Congregational prayer is
shortened
by 2 Rakas ,
we do the
same here
.....
According
to the 43244
format the
friday noon
prayer was 3
Raka ... and
thus it is
shortened
by 2 Rakas
to become
Sermon + 1
Raka ....
therefore we
replace 15
by 41244
(for Friday).
The resultant
number is
also a
multiple of
19:
| Sat |
Sun |
Mon |
Tues |
Wed |
Thur |
Frid |
|
| 1 43244 |
2 43244 |
3 43244 |
4 43244 |
5 43244 |
6 43244 |
7 41244 |
= 19 x .... |
Fact 9 The
same as the
previous,
except again
take Friday
as the first
day of the
week,
instead of
the last day.
The resultant
number is
also a
multiple of
19:
| Sat |
Sun |
Mon |
Tues |
Wed |
Thur |
Frid |
|
| 1 41244 |
2 43244 |
3 43244 |
4 43244 |
5 43244 |
6 43244 |
7 43244 |
= 19 x .... |
.
CONCLUSION
.
May it be
said that this
research
does not
mean to
tarnish the
good work
done by our
dear brother
submitters,
but it means
to give signs
for those
who are
unbiased
and are truly
seeking the
truth.
What this
research
hopes to
have
clarified In
Sha Allah is
the
difference
between
numerical
arrangments
obtained
from
different sets
of numbers
that add up
to the same
sum ( e.g.
the digits of
24434 add
up to 17, so
does the
digits of
43244, plus
they are
both
divisible by
19) ... and
between true
signs from
God that
CANNOT
BE
DUPLICATED.
As shown,
all the
multiples
obtained
from 24434
can also be
obtained
from 43244
.... this is
possible
because of
the rules of
numerology.
However,
the miracle
in the Quran
(take the
miracle in
the first 4
words that
makes up
the basmalah
as an
example)
cannot be
duplicated.
We cannot
re-arrange
the four
words in the
Basmalah or
their letters
(as we re-arranged
24434) and
still obtain
the same
results.
When we
analyse the
letters and
words in the
Basmalah,
we find that
they are
bonded
together in
two separate
patterns.
First we
have the 3-4-6-6 pattern
which is the
number of
letters in
each of the
four words,
then we also
have
individual
gematric
values for
each of the
19 letters.
While as the
rules of
numerology
allow us to
obtain
identical
results from
24434 and
43244,
numerology
stands
helpless in
providing us
with a
dulpicate to
the
miraculous
pattern in the
basmalah.
This leads
us ultimately
to
distinguish
between
what is no
more than
tricks of
numerlogy
and what is
indeed signs
from God.
The first
can be
duplicated,
the second
CANNOT
be
duplicated.
If man was
able to part
the Red Sea
today, that
would make
the same
event that
occured at
the time of
Moses un-miraculous.
If someone
can
duplicate the
miracle of
the 19 in the
Quran in
another
book, that
would also
render the
miracle of
19 in the
Quran un-miraculous.
God in His
infinite
Wisdom
knows that
these events
CANNOT
BE
DUPLICATED. That is
why God
offers His
challenge to
mankind
with the
words
"produce
one like it !"
(2:23).
The
rejectors of
the great
miracle in
the Quran
have always
accused Dr.
Khalifa of
being
obsessed
with
numerology
.... but they
done so
because they
were not
able to
comprehend
the
difference
between
tricks of
numerology
that can be
duplicated
and between
the great
miracle in
the Quran
which
cannot be
duplicated.
One
excellent
observation
about the
miracle of
19 was the
words of the
believer who
said (in
terms of
probability it
is more
plausible to
think that the
Arabic
alphabet was
set to
accomodate
the miracle,
rather than
the miracle
being set on
a given
alphabet) ....
What this
observation
really points
to is that
God must
have
designed the
Arabic
language
(long before
the Quran
was
revealed) in
relation to
the great
miracle to be
revealed
centuries
later.
In his
excellent
article
(Beyond
probability),
brother
Abdullah
Arik has
demonstrated what
makes the
miracle in
the Quran
truly
awesome,
that being
the fact that
it presents a
complete
defiance of
the laws of
probabilities.
Consequently, we must
be very
careful
before
interpreting
any
calculations
as
AWESOME
SIGNS
FROM
GOD. God
has defined
for us His
signs as
those that
cannot be
duplicated
(that is what
makes them
miraculous)
.... they are
UNIQUE ....
the
claculations
obtained
from 24434
are NOT
unique, they
can be
duplicated
as shown in
this
research.
The true
believers will
take heed
and will
abide by the
role given by
God for the
code of 19.
In Sura 74,
God tells us
that the code
of 19 is
employed
specifically
to prove the
divinity of
the book as
opposed to
those who
claimed that
the Quran is
man-made
(74:25). Indeed the
miracle of
the Quran is
IN THE
QURAN .....
it is not in
personal
calculations
worked out
by
employing
non-Quranic
data to
prove non-Quranic
issues!
For all those
who employ
the code of
19 to prove
claims,
assumptions
and numbers
that are not
Quranic
based, they
will indeed
obtain many
numerical
calculations
that may
look
impressive,
but as
shown they
are NOT
UNIQUE ...
they can be
duplicated
.... and
therefore, by
definition,
they are
NOT
SIGNS
FROM
GOD.
Praise
God
.
back to
Salat
Related
Topics page
back to
'SALAT'
main page
.
|